Warning: Undefined array key 2 in /home/celtbat0/rickbattle/pages/thoughts-head.php on line 127
Transforming Sunny into Ominous - Protips | Rick Battle Photography

Transforming Sunny into Ominous

The goal of the fine art photographer is to express a mood, a feeling, share your frame of mind with your viewer and cause them to experience the same emotion you felt when looking at a scene. Unless you work in a studio and control every element of the scene, this is essentially impossible to achieve in camera. Thus, we rely on post production to transform what we captured into what we want to show. To demonstrate this concept, I’ll walk you through how I transformed a bright sunny afternoon in Washington DC into a dark and ominous scene. Along the way, we’ll discuss tonal separation, bayer filters, foveon sensors, layer adjustments, masking, stacked masks, the keystone effect, and readying an image for printing, so pack a lunch, strap in, and enjoy the ride!

Supreme Court of the United States, Straight out of the Camera
Supreme Court of the United States, Straight out of the Camera
Shot August 17th, 2015
Nikon D800
Nikon 50mm f/1.4
B+W 10 stop ND filter
ISO 100, f/11, 15 seconds

I wanted to at least get 30 seconds, but it was so bright outside, I was blowing highlights and didn’t want to stop down any further.

What’s your first impression of the image? Does it impart an emotion? Unless you have experience with the Supreme Court or are a fan of the architecture itself, the exposure probably doesn’t do anything for you. That’s ok. It’s a technically correct but decidedly boring image.

Supreme Court of the United States, Final Edit
Supreme Court of the United States, Final Edit
Principle edits in Photoshop
Final touches in Lightroom

How about now? For starters, do you like the direction I took the image? Does a darker visage better fit the ultimate court of the land? I, of course, think it does. The decisions that are made here can and have massively impacted the direction of the country. Thus, I wanted to give the building an ominous overtone to show the awe and respect I have for it and the power it wields.

So, how did I do it? How did I transform a bright and sunny afternoon into a dark and foreboding scene? Let’s dive in!

Step 1: Scene Simplification
Supreme Court of the United States, Straight out of the Camera Scene Simplification

The first thing I always do is scene simplification. I remove any distracting elements whose removal won’t fundamentally alter the scene. I don’t want to remove so much that it looks staged. Ideally, I wouldn’t need this step, but the police probably would have gotten upset if I started moving their signs and cones around, so Photoshop it is. Content Aware Fill and the Content Aware Patch tool did the heavy lifting here.

Step 2: Darken the Sky
Scene Simplification Scene Simplification

Wouldn’t it be nice if there were a “Darken Sky” button. That alone would save so much time. Seriously Adobe, if you’re reading this, get on it ;)

I don’t know why, but I seem to invent a new way of darkening the sky every time I do it. This time, I combined a few different adjustments to achieve the final effect.

First, I added a Black & White filter:

Black & White Filter

It’s essentially a deep red filter. Ansel Adams was famous for using red filters to darken his skies. That works great on film. On a digital camera with a Bayer Filter (this is most of you), if you use a red filter, you’d only be using about 25% of your sensor’s pixels to capture the scene. So, do your color filtering in post.

If you have a camera with a Foveon Sensor, you should be able to use color filters without the aforementioned 25% sensor utilization problem. I say “should” because I don’t own one, so don’t take my word for it.

Here’s the result of the deep red filter:

Deep Red Filter Result

Man, that sky looks good, doesn’t it? But, we’re not going for a Black & White image, so I changed the Blending Mode to Hard Light. How did I know to use Hard Light? Simple, I didn’t. I cycled through every blending mode and picked the one that looked the best. Experimentation is always the answer when you know what you want, but don’t know how to get there.

Hard Light:

Hard Light Result

We’ve managed to keep the blue tones in the lighter areas and the high contrast of the deep red filter. Perfect.

Since this is only for the sky, I masked out the building:

Building Mask

Creating masks is a (massive) topic in and of itself, so I’m going to apologize for glossing over the details and move on.

After masking:

Scene Simplification Mask Result

We have achieved the goal of darkening the sky. But, the deep red filter has made the sky extremely contrasty. While a neat effect by itself, the clouds are not the subject of this image, so I used an Exposure adjustment and knocked a stop and half off.

Exposure Adjustment


Mask Result Exposure Adjustment Result

That looks better. We’ve retained the drama of the deep red filter, but now the sky is very definitely part of the background and won’t fight with the subject for the viewer’s attention.

Step 3: Edit the Building

Ok, where to begin? There’s a lot of work to be done. The building is tonally flat. From left to right, the only variation comes from the shadows, but even still, the columns in the second row and back wall are just a bright as the front row. The stairs are just as bright as the roof. All of this is unacceptable.

First, let's add some clarity. Clarity makes everything look better, right?

Camera Raw

Wait, Photoshop has a Clarity slider?! Well, not exactly. Go to Filter->Camera Raw Filter and it will look suspiciously like Lightroom. But, unlike Lightroom, these edits aren’t non-destructive. Once you apply 100% clarity, there’s no going back. So, anytime you use something like this, make a layer copy and apply the Camera Raw Filter to the copy. That way, you can control the intensity of the edit with the Opacity of the layer.

I created a group for the building edits and set its Blending Mode to Hard Light as well. It worked out so well for the sky, I figured it’d be the theme for the image.

Here’s the result of making a group, adding a layer copy, and a Clarity layer copy with the opacity set to 50%, then setting the group’s Blending Mode to Hard Light:

Exposure Adjustment Result Clarity Result

The shadows are deeper, but by layering the building over itself with Hard Light, we’ve made it yellow. This is, not so good.

To desaturate and enhance texture, I layered in another Black & White filter:

Black & White Filter

Unlike the previous Black & White filter, which emulated a deep red filter, this one has no equivalent traditional color filter that I’m aware of.

Here’s the result of the filter:

Clarity Result Black & White Filter Result

Boom. Now you can see where the real character of the final image came from. I very seriously considered stopping here. The texture in the building could be enough to make the image visually interesting, but if you blur your eyes, the texture goes away and the truth comes back out: the building is still tonally flat.

The first step in tonal manipulation was to add broad vignette-esque gradient with a negative exposure adjustment:

Exposure Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Black & White Filter Result Exposure Adjustment Result

Alright. Now the roof and stairs no longer share the same tonal value. But, the stairs really aren’t the subject here, so let’s make them even darker. This time, I used a Brightness/Contrast adjustment. I didn’t just want to make the stairs darker. That’s too obvious of an edit. But, by dropping the brightness and upping the contrast, it’ll look more natural.

The Brightness/Contrast adjustment:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Exposure Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

Wait, didn’t I say this was going to look natural? This looks terrible. Let’s see if we can fix it with a gradient mask:

Gradient Mask
The result:
Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Gradient Mask Result

That’s better. I think we can work with this.

Wait, back up. How did you stack layer masks?!

The answer is significantly less graceful than I would prefer. I dearly wish you could simply apply two masks to one layer. But alas, you can not. So, you have to put the masked adjustment into a group and apply the second mask to the group:

Stacked Masks

Clunky but functional.

Since we’re in the lower portion of the image, let’s take care of some other non-subject bits and make them darker:

Exposure Adjustment
The mask:

Not a lot covered here. Just a bunch of small stuff. Kind of Scene Simplification Round II, but by making things darker, not removing them. Remember, the human eye is drawn to highlights, so if there’s something you don’t want the viewer to waste their time looking at, just make it darker.

And, the result:

Gradient Mask Result Exposure Adjustment Result

Not exactly a mind-blowing change. It's was only a -0.79 stop change. Just clean up really. So, let’s do some heavy lifting.

The left and right sides of the building and the definition of tonally flat. Let’s change that. Again, we’re going to drop the brightness and up the contrast:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

The mask:


If this doesn’t have a big effect, I’m going to be rather upset ...

Exposure Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

Finally, the sides of the building are no longer tonally flat! Again, I considered stopping here. I even stopped for an evening after getting this done. I was pretty sure I was done. But, when I came back the next day, I decided that I was very much so not done.

When you’ve gotten to the point where you think you might be done, taking a break and coming back to an image later will (hopefully) reveal to you areas that warrant improvement. A fresh set of eyes always helps.

Next up, an easy one. I wanted the blinds to be just a touch darker:

Exposure Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Exposure Adjustment Result

Another not-exactly-earth-shattering change. But, subtlety is the path to success here.

Speaking of subtlety, let's make another massive change.

The more I looked at the columns, the more I realized I was going to have to do something with them. The second row and back wall simply can not be as bright as the front row.

For the back wall, I wanted the bright spots completely gone. That meant matching the shadows. This turned out to be non-trivial. I tried an Exposure adjustment. I tried a Brightness/Contrast adjustment. I tried Curves. I tried Levels. Nothing worked. Lots of experimentation later, a combination of Curves, Brightness/Contrast, and Levels seemed to work the best:

Curves Adjustment
Brightness/Contrast Adjustment
Levels Adjustment
Adjustment Results

Can I get a “Wow!” please? I mean, I’m impressed. Are you not? Ok, so it’s not perfect. It’s maybe a little too contrasty and the edges could certainly use some refinement, but I’d be inclined to argue that it still looks pretty damn good, eh?

Have I mentioned that I hand painted every single one of these masks? Yeah, no fancy Select and Mask nonsense for me. Just the good old fashioned Brush tool. Would I prefer to use the Select and Mask function instead of hand painting each mask? Of course I would, but I can’t seem to get it to make a useable mask to save my life. It seems to be great for selecting something for background removal and pasting into another setting; however, if you’re trying to select part of an image to modify it (not remove it), the Select and Mask tool doesn’t seem to be able to hand edges that are more than a pixel (or so) wide.


This is a 1200% zoom from the above chunk of back wall. Look at how wide that edge is from the shadow to the bright are. It’s at least 8 pixels wide. In my mind, it shouldn’t be that hard for Photoshop to select the bright area and make a smooth gradient in the mask for the edge. In practice however, I can’t get it to do anything like that. So, I choose a soft brush set to about twice the width of the edge and paint until I’m satisfied with the mask. It’s painful and time consuming, but it works better than anything else I’ve found.

I think I said earlier that I wasn’t going to dive into masking, so I apologize for the derailment. Let’s move on.

With the back wall taken care of I moved on to the secondary columns. Here, I wasn’t trying to match the shadows (otherwise I would have just added them to the “back wall” mask), so a single Curves adjustment sufficed.

Curves Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Exposure Adjustment Result Curves Adjustment Result

Hey, look at that! Now the front columns really stand out against the secondary columns and back wall. This really feels like progress. But, the front columns themselves are tonally flat. The direct sunlight completely flattened them. Wouldn’t it be nice if our big round columns actually looked round? Let’s see if we can do something about that with another Brightness/Contrast adjustment. Are you seeing a pattern yet?

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Curves Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

That’s more like it. I think I would have prefered a more pronounced difference between the dark side and the light side of the column, but that wasn’t really possible. I didn’t want to make the dark side any darker and couldn’t make the light side any lighter lest they compete with subject.

In making the comuns darker, the base of the columns now look too bright. Let’s fix that. I’ll give you 10 fake internet points if you can guess what adjustment I used ;)

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

Did you guess Brightness/Contrast? Good job.

Here’s the mask:


ERMAHGERD, you missed one!!! It’s ok, I know. I started to mask that one in, but when looking at it, it really didn’t need it. Take a look at the result and let me know if you still think I need to go back and add that one in:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

How’s that look? Passably acceptable, I hope.

While the subject really is the top of the building, I also wanted to highlight the statues on either side of the stairs, so I did:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

The rather unsurprising mask:


And, the glowing statue result:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

What do you think? Too much? Well I rather like it, so I’m keeping it.

Finally, we arrive at the raison d'être, the roof. I call it the roof, because I am not an architect and don’t what what the front bit with all of the people, words, and fiddly bits is called. So, until someone educates me, it’s part of the roof.

First, let’s separate the people from the background by darkening the background a bit:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

Let’s go further. Let’s add a little more tonal contrast and darken their clothing:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

That was neat. Let’s do it again. But by “it”, I mean add more tonal contrast. This time, let’s brighten the people:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

We’re getting really close, but something is missing. Can you guess what it is?

You can’t read the words, so let’s ink them:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result

Boom sauce.

We’re done, right? That’s what “Boom sauce” means, right? Yeah, no. There’s always more!

Ok, not always, but in this particular case, there are two more things to do (in Photoshop).

Thing 1: burn the left side:

Editor’s Note: “Burn” in this particular context is referring to “Burn & Dodge”, not the more common “set something on fire”, though the Burn tool will not actually be used. "Burn" can, and apparently is, being used colloquially to mean “make darker”, which is effectively what the Burn tool does.

Editor’s Note to the Editor’s Note: The effect of the Burn tool is admittedly a bit more complicated than just “making it a bit darker”, but that’s what’s about to happen, so just go with it.

Exposure Adjustment

The mask:


Thing 2: burn the right side:

Editor’s Note: See the previous editor’s note(s).

Exposure Adjustment

The mask:


And, the result:

Brightness/Contrast Adjustment Result Exposure Adjustment Result

Looks pretty good, no? Have we achieved tonal separation between the foreground and background? Yes. Have we achieved tonal separation between the primary subject and the secondary portions of the building? Yes. Cool.

For reference, here’s the full layer stack:


And, we’re done … with Photoshop. Back into Lightroom we go!

But but, what could there possibly be left to do?

Don’t worry, just minor finish work is left. All of the heavy lifting is done.


Step 4: Finish Work

Fundamentally, this is an architecture piece. (Really, no way?!)

The fastest way to tell ameteur architecture work from professional architecture work is the presence or absence of the Keystone Effect. The Keystone Effect is what makes buildings look like they’re leaning away from you when you angle your lens upward. The effect isn’t overly pronounced in this shot because it was taken at 50mm. The effect becomes more pronounced as your focal length gets wider (and less pronounced as your focal length gets longer).

Unless you are specifically using the Keystone Effect to achieve your vision, it absolutely MUST be corrected. There are 2 ways to correct the Keystone Effect:

  1. The best method is to correct it optically with a Tilt-Shift lens. Since it is the best option, it is also the most expensive option. Nikon calls their tilt-shift lenses Perspective Control lenses. The entire rest of the world ignores Nikon’s naming convention and calls them tilt-shift lens.
    1. Nikon 19mm f/4 PC-E
    2. Nikon 24mm f/3.5 PC-E
    3. Nikon 45mm f/2.8 PC-E
    4. Nikon 85mm f/2.8 PC-E
    5. Canon 17mm f/4 TS-E
    6. Canon 24mm f/3.5 TS-E
    7. Canon 45mm f/2.8 TS-E
    8. Canon 90mm f/2.8 TS-E
    9. Rokinon 24mm f/2.8 TS for Nikon
    10. Rokinon 24mm f/2.8 TS for Canon
    11. Rokinon 24mm f/2.8 TS for Sony E Mount
    12. Rokinon 24mm f/2.8 TS for Sony A Mount
  2. The alternate (and significantly cheaper) method is to correct it in Lightroom.

Since I don’t own the 45mm tilt shift (thus why this image was shot with my 50mm), correcting the keystone effect in Lightroom was the only option.

Correcting in Lightroom can come a pretty serious downside though, so weigh your options (and budget) carefully. Since Lightroom is correcting the keystone effect by stretching, shifting, and cropping the image you are sacrificing resolution. The amount of resolution lost is dependant on how much stretching, shifting, and cropping is required to straighten the building. When shooting at 50mm or longer, the amount of resolution lost is normally acceptable. If you shoot at 14mm, really angle your camera up, and try to correct the keystone effect in Lightroom, you’re probably not going to be very happy with the result.

In Lightroom, there are several options for correcting the keystone effect, all of which are found in the Transform Module. For this image there are only 2 viable options: Vertical & Auto.

For reference, here’s the uncorrected image again:

Uncorrected Image

Vertical correction vs Uncorrected:

Uncorrected Image Vertical Correction

Auto correction vs Uncorrected:

Uncorrected Image Auto Correction

Auto correction vs Vertical correction:

Vertical Correction Auto Correction

What you’re seeing is an example of 2 point perspective vs 1 point perspective. Vertical correction maintains a 2 point perspective, while Auto correction reduces the view to a 1 point perspective.

It’s really your choice as to which version you like better. I opted for Vertical correction because I didn’t want to lose the sense of depth that comes from having the left side of the building be further away than the right side of the building. If I wanted only 1 point perspective, I would have stood in the center of the building. But, that’s not what I was going for, thus I stood off to the side. But again, this is all personal preference. Which version do you like better?

After selecting a keystone correction method, we turn to our old friend, the histogram. Once you’ve done everything else, the histogram should be your second to last stop when finishing an image.

Here’s the histogram for the image in its current state:


As you can see, it’s shifted pretty heavily to the left (which is fine since we’re going for an ominous ambiance). The problem is the gap on the right. That gap means we’re not making use of the full dynamic range. While there’s probably no room for pure white in this image, we can still boost the highlights and whites to get more dynamic range without changing the mood of the image.

Boost Highlights & Whites

The new histogram:

New Histogram

That’s better.

Here's, the result:

Vertical Correction Boost Result

See a difference? It’s pretty subtle, but it’ll print better this way. In general, you should seek to maximize the dynamic range of an image, so long as it doesn’t change the overall feeling of the piece.

Last, but not least (ok, maybe least), is the Detail tab.

Here’s a zoomed in view of two of the upper people, no changes made yet:

Upper People

When you get that close, you can see it’s maybe not quite as sharp as we’d like. Is that a result of the keystone correction? Maybe. Diffraction from stopping down to f/11? Maybe. Was it some combination of those plus a multitude of other factors. Generally yes. I wouldn’t get too worked up about sharpness, but it (almost) never hurts to add a touch in right at the very end.


And, here's the result:

Upper People Sharpened

As you can see, it’s just a wee bit sharper than the untouched version. And that’s all we’re going for, slightly better.

After sharpening:

Boost Result Final Version

At web sizes, there is absolutely no difference between the unsharpened version and the final sharpened version. Sharpening only makes a difference if you print big, and I mean really big. And, even then, only if you get really close to it. Most (normal) people aren’t going to get within a few inches of your massive print to see how sharp it is on the pixel level. So, again, don’t get too worked about it. Focus on expressing your vision. That’s what really matters.

Final Comparison:

SOOC Final Version

Are you still working on developing your vision? That’s ok. We all are. The real secret is not to go it alone. Art is not made in a vacuum. Bring a guide with you. And by that, I mean, Steal Like an Artist ;)

Steal Like an Artist

While I was working on the building, I had one of Joel Tjintjelaar’s images up on my second monitor. His understanding of tonal relationships is masterful. I can only hope to one day approach his level. So, until then, I use his work as a conceptual reference. Go find someone’s work that you really admire, wish to emulate, and do exactly that. The journey will teach you everything you need to know to forge your own path and develop your vision.

Standard width couch

Limited edition prints are available in the print shop. Get yours today!

Share with your friends:

Facebook Twitter Reddit Email

Must See:
Jump to Latest:

Nara Deer
Go somewhere new:

Norfolk & VA Beach From the Air
Go somewhere exciting:

Sunset at Twin Peaks

Must Own:


Sunset on Bombay Beach

Sunset on the Beach

Southern Sophistication